ENGINEERING REFERENCE · 10GbE

DAC vs AOC

Compare direct-attach copper and active optical cables for short SFP+ links.

Passive DACActive AOCSFP+
The important bit: DAC and AOC are cable assemblies with transceiver electronics integrated into the ends. Their supported length and interoperability are product-specific.
FactorDACAOC
MediumTwinax copperOptical fibre with active electronics
Typical useSame rack / adjacent rackLonger short-reach links where copper DAC is unsuitable
Separate opticsNoNo
Electrical isolationNoYes, across the optical portion
Power/thermalGenerally low for passive DAC, but cable assembly limits applyActive ends consume power

Passive DAC

Passive DAC uses copper twinax with SFP+ ends. It is attractive for short, fixed interconnects because there are no separate optical transceivers and the assembly is simple. Length limits and supported host combinations should be taken directly from the cable vendor and switch/NIC documentation.

AOC

An active optical cable contains optical conversion at the ends. It can extend farther than passive copper DAC while remaining a single assembly. It is useful when an SFP+ link is short enough for an AOC but not convenient for twinax.

Compatibility

Switches and NICs can enforce vendor coding or supported-cable lists. A physically identical-looking SFP+ DAC/AOC may not be accepted by every platform. Check supported transceiver/cable part numbers before ordering large quantities.

When to use structured fibre instead

If the link needs to pass through patch panels, buildings, floors or a future-proof fibre plant, a conventional optical transceiver plus structured fibre is usually easier to document and maintain than a cable assembly. DAC/AOC is best treated as an equipment interconnect.

Back to How Far Can 10Gb Ethernet Run? →